Rollout details and timing of new “Visa Integrity Fee” remain unclear

Created earlier this year as a part of H.R. 1 (otherwise known as the One Big Beautiful Bill), a new “Visa Integrity Fee” would add a $250 charge to all approved nonimmigrant visas, in addition to any already existing application fees (pg. 300). The details of when this fee will go into effect and how it will be implemented, however, remain unclear. 

Many news outlets are currently reporting that the fee will go into effect on October 1, but that is not a certainty and will most likely not be the case. 

A July 22, 2025 Federal Register notice said that “the Visa Integrity Fee requires cross-agency coordination before implementing; the fee will be implemented in a future publication.” We have not heard any other official updates from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on implementation timing or process. 

The Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs, responsible for all visa issuance, also does not yet know when the fee will go into effect and what the details of implementation will look like. Senior Consular officials have told the Alliance that they have not received any details or guidance from DHS. 

While media reports are indicating an October 1 implementation date, it’s possible that this misinformation is coming from reading the bill language inaccurately. The bill says that the initial amount of the fee “for fiscal year 2025” will be at least $250, so some might be inferring (incorrectly) that it means that the government will begin implementation on the first day of fiscal year 2026, which is October 1, 2025. But nowhere in the bill text does it indicate an October 1 effective date. 

As the July 22 notice stated, there’s much “cross-agency coordination” that must happen before the fee is actually implemented. If the government happens to be able to do the necessary coordination and set up new systems before October 1, then the fee could theoretically start October 1. But the more likely scenario is that DHS will need more time, and the fee will be implemented further down the road, whenever the system is set up following the inter-agency coordination process. 

An interesting wrinkle in this fee is that it is meant to be reimbursable. H.R.1 describes the $250 fee as applicable to all nonimmigrant visas and to be paid at the time the visa is issued. The bill also notes that visa holders will be reimbursed the $250 if they: 

• Complied with all conditions of the visa, including not accepting unauthorized employment; 

• Have not sought to extend admission and departed the U.S. no later than 5 days after the last day of the visa’s valid period; or were granted an extension or adjustment to the status of lawful permanent resident. 

Like many other details, it’s unclear how a reimbursement of this fee might be processed. There is also no detail about how it would be applicable to visa holders changing status or what the five days means in the context of the 30-day grace period that comes with J-1 visas. Additionally, the Congressional Budget Office1 in its cost estimate of H.R. 1 noted that it may take several years to implement a reimbursement process for this fee, creating more uncertainty about the timing of this system’s release. 

The Alliance continues to seek information on all of these details about this new fee and will keep our members posted as soon as we know more.  

Unnecessary visa interview pause threatens U.S. prosperity and security

The Trump administration’s decision to temporarily pause scheduling F, M, and J visa appointments jeopardizes the success of international exchange programs essential to the U.S.’ economic prosperity and national security.  On Tuesday, May 27, Politico reported that a cable sent to all embassies and consular posts by Secretary of State Marco Rubio called for consular sections to "not add any additional student or exchange visitor (F, M and J) visa appointment capacity until further guidance is issued.” This request stems from the Department’s plan to “evaluate operations and processes in preparation for expanded social media vetting of all student and exchange visitor visa applicants.”  The cable also states that “appointments already scheduled can proceed under current guidelines,” though the Alliance received reports that a small number of previously scheduled interviews were canceled after the cable was sent. It is important to note the scope of this pause: this impacts international youth, students, and professionals participating in BridgeUSA exchange programs, international leaders participating in professional exchanges, international students and scholars planning to contribute to U.S. universities and colleges, and so many more.  This pause negatively impacts the American businesses, families, schools, and communities that benefit from engaging with international exchange participants, leaders, and international students and scholars in their everyday life.  

Without... 

• ... international students, the U.S. would forfeit the $43.8 billion they contribute to the U.S. economy and the nearly 400,000 American jobs they support per year. 

• ... the International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP), which provides short-term professional exchanges for international leaders, the U.S. would miss out on the $81.7 million the IVLP community puts back into American communities. 

• ... Summer Work Travel BridgeUSA participants working with local seasonal businesses across the country, the U.S. would lose the $353 million participants spend in the U.S. every year. 

• ... Intern and Trainee BridgeUSA participants working with American companies, the U.S. would lose the $264.2 million participants spend in the U.S. every year. 

• ... BridgeUSA Au Pairs supporting American families, the U.S. would lose the $143.8 million Au Pairs spend in the U.S. every year, and many American families will see their childcare costs increase significantly. 

• ... Camp Counselor BridgeUSA participants creating life-changing summer experiences for American youth, the U.S. would lose the $50.1 million Camp Counselors spend in the U.S. every year. 

And this just scratches the surface of all the ways international exchange participants and students make America more prosperous and enhance communities across the U.S. 

The Alliance strongly encourages the Department of State to immediately resume all nonimmigrant visa appointments for international exchange and education programs. 

Navigating the Paradox: International Student Visa Trends in 2023

The dynamic landscape of international education has been marked this year by a powerful paradox: aspiring international students are displaying a renewed interest in studying in the U.S., yet this enthusiasm is met with a growing struggle to secure visas. A dichotomy emerges – while U.S. enrollments are surging for the first time since the pandemic, a shadow looms as visa denials rise. Collectively, these elements shape the trajectory of international student mobility, offering insights into the United States’ public diplomacy impact and its role as a competitive global player.

As the grip of the pandemic loosens, 2023 has ushered in a renewed wave of international student mobility to the United States. The U.S. suffered a steep 15% decline in international student enrollments between the 2016-17 and 2020-21 academic years, and saw a modest uptick of 4% last year. Recent data released by the U.S. Department of State paints a promising picture of a substantial surge in F-1 student visa issuances in 2022. Compared to 2019, the last pre-pandemic point of comparison, student visa issuances increased almost 13%, from 364,204 in 2019 to 411,131 in 2022. The State Department projects the numbers for 2023 to be even higher than last year (over 393,000 F-1 visas have already been issued up to the beginning of August).

Yet, amidst this resurgence is an increasing number of visa denials. State Department data reveals that over a third of student visa applications were denied in 2022. This marks an increase from the 20% denial rate in 2021, as well as the 25% denial rate in 2019. African students were particularly affected, with over half experiencing denials in 2022. Despite the enthusiasm to study in the U.S., many students are grappling with challenges throughout the visa application process, including complex immigration policies, challenges securing interview slots, visa processing delays, and the looming anxiety of potential rejections. This reality raises fundamental questions about the accessibility of American education.

How can we make sense of the simultaneous increase in visa issuances alongside the concerning rise in visa denials? The paradox is well illustrated by the case of Africa. Despite the discouraging rates of visa denials, which might suggest a gloomy outlook for U.S. student enrollment, the 2022 Open Doors data shows a substantial surge in student mobility from Sub-Saharan Africa to the U.S. In addition, last year, U.S. embassies and consulates in Africa issued 30,000+ student visas, more than in any of the previous six years. In particular, Nigeria and Ghana saw the highest number of student visas issued in more than two decades. While concerns about visa challenges affecting accessibility remain, the strong desire for American education becomes evident through the growing issuance of student visas in countries like Nigeria and Ghana.

Efforts to address student visa challenges are underway, with a recent meeting between the State Department and NAFSA, the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, and Shorelight. The discussions highlighted a visa denial report and acknowledged the importance of rectifying high visa denial rates, particularly in the Global South. Earlier this year, the State Department took steps to demonstrate its commitment to improving accessibility and efficiency of the visa application process. Some students are now eligible for visa waivers, and applicants can apply one year in advance, an expansion from the previous 120-day limit.

The evolving international student visa trends of 2023 introduce a complex dynamic between aspiration and challenge, promise and uncertainty. As we forge ahead, addressing the visa denial paradox becomes crucial not only for fostering inclusivity and global education accessibility but also for the United States to fortify its position as a leader in global education. The path forward demands a cohesive approach, with collaboration between stakeholders, governments, and educational institutions, along with our community that routinely transforms big dreams into reality.